Q. After 35 years in the investment business, what has driven you to become a debut author?
A. Throughout my career in the investment business, I advanced my knowledge of financial markets and the global political decisions which drive their directions and trends. I was determined to understand politics on not only the local level, but on the national and global levels as well. The more I read, the more I formed strong opinions, and those strong opinions fueled my desire to write. This passion to write had been on the back burner until I was able to devote the time to make becoming a serious writer my priority. Now that time has finally come, and I intend to become a relevant writer as my new primary career.
Q. So much of the material in NOT BLACK AND WHITE is ripped from the headlines and features actual events with real people. Why did you choose to publish this book as fiction?
A. I don't believe the articles in newspapers or online are necessarily accurate. Additionally, many publications have their own agendas, and therefore the information in the articles may be biased. Though I primarily used these previous writings to formulate the basis for the story of NOT BLACK AND WHITE, I was unwilling to accept the information as accurate or factual. I don't think anyone is capable of telling this story as non-fiction. As an aspiring writer, when I started this book I wanted to create excitement and entertainment, which required a great deal of speculation. My creative juices took over, and I chose to fictionalize the characters and events with my goal to provide the reader with an entertaining novel. I also wanted to challenge the reader to determine fact from fiction.
Q. How much of the action (and characters) in NOT BLACK AND WHITE is true and how much has been fictionalized?
A. Since the story is loosely based upon the true characters and events, and I question many of the facts as previously written, I am speculating on how the stories played out. I cannot say with certainty, nor am I willing to share my opinion, as to what events actually happened as written.
Q. In order to write this book, you must have had access to a wealth of inside knowledge and background information that the average joe outside the halls of power would not be privy to. What can you tell us about your sources?
A. As I stated in the Author's Notes, my resources for this book were the many articles written about this time in history. The story is totally speculation enhanced by my curiosity and imagination and applied to prior written accounts of characters and events.
Q. Many folks will compare your book to Joe Klein's PRIMARY COLORS. How are the two books similar/ different? Would you compare your novel to any other political thrillers?
A. Joe Klein's Primary Colors was, in my opinion, a very entertaining book. Mr. Klein used the fictionalized accounting of characters and events to write his novel. Obviously, that strategy was the same for NOT BLACK AND WHITE, and the subject content of both books is politics during a specific time in history. The similarity ends with that strategy for telling the story. I cannot think of another novel or political thriller that would compare to either book.
Q. You have stated publicly that you voted for Obama in the 2008 election. How has your view of President Obama changed since researching and writing NOT BLACK AND WHITE?
A. I did vote for President Obama in 2008. I did my best to avoid any personal perspective relating to my political views. My writing of NOT BLACK AND WHITE did not influence my personal opinion of Obama. My views of Obama have, however, been formulated based upon the actions and policies of the President and his administration during the past six years.
Q. Do you associate with a particular political party? How has your affiliation changed over time, and, in particular, after writing this book?
A. My political affiliation was not affected by the writing of this book. I strongly believe that both major parties are too extreme. I do not affiliate with either party, and would like to see a truly credible candidate represent an independent third party. The independent vote is critical for either party to win a presidential election. Additionally, it appears the size of that vote is growing, as more voters are becoming dissatisfied with the major party base and their political platforms. Hopefully someday the political process will offer an electable third party candidate to represent the independent voters.
Q. What does the phrase "Chicago-style politics" mean to you? What makes Chicago unique in the realm of politics and power?
A. Chicago is one of the most difficult cities to govern for a number of reasons. It might be the most diverse city in the country, as it became a melting pot for immigrants of all nationalities. Settlers from around the globe have established neighborhoods. The city became a major center for trade, creating labor and cultural challenges since the 19th century. To this day, labor unions dominate the political landscape. Additionally, organized crime has been associated with Chicago for as long as I can remember.
Although Chicago doesn't stand alone in the challenges of crime and corruption in politics, its mayors have been challenged to make it “The City that Works". The political machines in Chicago and Illinois have been at the center of media coverage for over a century. “Chicago-style politics" has earned its reputation by those in power playing by their own rules, which in many cases has landed numerous political figures in front of the cameras on their way to prison. Not Black And White depicts a prime example of just such an era in Chicago-style politics.
Q. What would have to happen for our political system to change and corruption to lessen?
A. Obviously, power corrupts. In many cases the temptation to participate is overwhelming, even for a politician who starts out with good intentions. My suggestions would not totally solve the problem of ill-intentioned power seekers, but they would not be influenced by the need to raise campaign funds from these special interest groups.
First of all, I would overhaul the rules governing the funding of political campaigns at all levels. As idealistic as this sounds, I would eliminate all lobbyists. I would rewrite campaign finance law so that no one may contribute to any candidate. Political candidates would receive a fixed amount of taxpayer dollars, with every qualifying candidate receiving the same allotment. Debates would be sponsored by TV stations and paid for by the taxpayer. A specific program would be defined and apply to each election. If lobbying and campaign funding by individuals and special interest groups were altered, as I am suggesting, the cost to the taxpayers would be a small fraction of the cost which ripples through the economy when the special interest groups pass along the cost of their agendas to the consumers. A prime example is Big Pharma and the healthcare lobby. My suggested program would clearly mitigate the corruption to the great benefit of the citizens of the United States at every level.
Q. You have travelled extensively but have chosen to live in Chicago for over twenty-five years. What attracted you to select Chicago as your home?
A. I have spent extended periods of time in many cities around the country. There are a number of reasons I choose to make Chicago my home. For anyone who has visited Chicago, and particularly in the spring, summer and fall, I don’t have to explain the attraction of the city. The city life offers an affordable lifestyle in a beautiful, clean urban environment. The arts, entertainment and dining options are extensive. The city is known as “The City that Works", and I find this to be true. The transportation options throughout the metropolitan Chicago area, as well as its proximity to two major airports, makes Chicago's accessibility to world travel second to none, in my opinion. Additionally, I find the Midwestern attitude and mentality, as evidenced by the friends I’ve made, better than anywhere else in the country. I love visiting New York and California, but for a home base, I choose Chicago.
Q. You call yourself a political junkie, and you are obviously well read, tell us what you read regularly, and add to that books you find to be among your favorites.
A. I subscribe to about thirty publications a month. I consider myself a serial reader of newsletters, both political and financial. I regularly read the Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Financial Times, USA Today, Chicago Crain’s as well as the two local Chicago newspapers. I read The Economist, and alternate between a number of monthly magazines, roughly eight to ten when I am home, and more when I travel. I read daily postings on many websites and from bloggers. Additionally, I subscribe to at least a dozen daily online newsletters. I estimate I spend a minimum of two hours a day during the week and roughly three to four hours on weekend days.
To name a few books I enjoyed these past few years, I would include 2030 by Albert Brooks, Game Changer, The Amateur by Edward Klein, as well as a number of biographies, which I typically read when I travel. My favorite novel is The Power of One by Bryce Courtenay.
Q. What projects are on tap for G. A. Beller?
A. I am co-authoring a second novel, which is about a childless couple who sponsor a young girl from India through a national children's fund. It's based upon a true story, taking readers on a miracle ride spanning a thirty-five year period. The reader will experience the changes to the lives of the main characters and hundreds of thousands of others. This novel will be the first in the Defining Karma™ book series, and will be an ongoing program for G. Anton Publishing. www.definingkarma.com